On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2012/2/22 Cedric Greevey <cgree...@gmail.com> >> >> If I may venture an opinion here: aren't some people over-thinking and >> maybe even gold-plating this? My own version is succinct, and moreover >> when the requirements were changed/clarified it required only changing >> a single "constants" to "[]" in a single spot in a single line of code >> to adjust it. >> >> YAGNI, folks. *If and when* you need multimethods and other >> complications rather than condp etc. sufficing, due to evolving >> requirements, then elaborate. Until then, do the simplest thing that >> works. :) > > > Peace :)
I learned a lot from both solutions, thanks again to both. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
