2012/2/22 Cedric Greevey <cgree...@gmail.com> > If I may venture an opinion here: aren't some people over-thinking and > maybe even gold-plating this? My own version is succinct, and moreover > when the requirements were changed/clarified it required only changing > a single "constants" to "[]" in a single spot in a single line of code > to adjust it. > > YAGNI, folks. *If and when* you need multimethods and other > complications rather than condp etc. sufficing, due to evolving > requirements, then elaborate. Until then, do the simplest thing that > works. :) >
Peace :) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
