On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:39 PM, kovas boguta <kovas.bog...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'm arguing that IMHO, the atom+watcher abstraction is not rich enough > to build upon. > I'm not disagreeing :) > If you want to roll your own, you need to maintain your own > notification system and bypass the existing mechanism entirely. This > is what I'll end up doing. Though if the update action had an > additional parameter, it would be more flexible. > Probably not worth breaking the expected behavior of Atoms. > Out of curiosity, what do you do with the old value? There are many reasons you might want to use the old value when developing user interfaces. All useful data-binding layers I'm familiar with from Cocoa to Backbone.js provide it. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
