Hi All,

This makes me feel quite embarrassed that autodoc hasn't seen a
release for non-core/contrib projects in so long. I apologize for
that. (Insert all the usual "life has been crazy... " caveats here.) I
hate seeing smart people having to recreate stuff just cause it's
taking me a long time to get around to it.

I had already put Autodoc on my "Christmas lull to-do list" and am
closing in on a new release. Depending how things go on disentagling
the recursive loop I've set up with Leiningen, I should have a 0.9.0
out this week.

Nicely, I think that Codox and Autodoc should coexist pretty happily
and Codox's life is somewhat simplified by not having to deal with the
core/contrib craziness (and not, I think, having to deal with
documenting multiple versions in the same package).

Tom

On Dec 26, 9:29 am, James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> In order to generate the documentation for Ring and Compojure, I
> created Codox after being unable to get Autodoc working.
>
> Codox is pretty simple, but should work out of the box, and hopefully
> looks quite nice. Here are a couple of examples:
>
> http://mmcgrana.github.com/ring/http://weavejester.github.com/compojure/
>
> Options are limited so far, but patches to add options or improve the
> formatting are welcome.
>
> The project page is here:
>
> https://github.com/weavejester/codox
>
> - James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to