Hi All, This makes me feel quite embarrassed that autodoc hasn't seen a release for non-core/contrib projects in so long. I apologize for that. (Insert all the usual "life has been crazy... " caveats here.) I hate seeing smart people having to recreate stuff just cause it's taking me a long time to get around to it.
I had already put Autodoc on my "Christmas lull to-do list" and am closing in on a new release. Depending how things go on disentagling the recursive loop I've set up with Leiningen, I should have a 0.9.0 out this week. Nicely, I think that Codox and Autodoc should coexist pretty happily and Codox's life is somewhat simplified by not having to deal with the core/contrib craziness (and not, I think, having to deal with documenting multiple versions in the same package). Tom On Dec 26, 9:29 am, James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > In order to generate the documentation for Ring and Compojure, I > created Codox after being unable to get Autodoc working. > > Codox is pretty simple, but should work out of the box, and hopefully > looks quite nice. Here are a couple of examples: > > http://mmcgrana.github.com/ring/http://weavejester.github.com/compojure/ > > Options are limited so far, but patches to add options or improve the > formatting are welcome. > > The project page is here: > > https://github.com/weavejester/codox > > - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en