On Dec 25, 12:01 pm, Alan Malloy <a...@malloys.org> wrote: > > Presumably you just tried it and found it doesn't work, so I'm not > sure what more you're looking for here. How would you even fill in the > body of the proxy? "I don't know what class this is, but I know > exactly what methods I need to override"? Probably you need to rethink > some things to get a design that doesn't require something so magical, > but eval is always available to you if you have some reason to believe > you require magic.
Yes, eval. I forgot about it. Eval is something I categorized as dangerous in my mind a long time ago, and decided never to use it. It seems that I also erased it from my memory. :) My expectation here is that proxy expects a value which for the base class, which is a java class (an instance of java.lang.Class), and I'd like to pass this value as a function parameter. >From design point of view, my proxy contruct tries to add an interface to a class. (Like a mixin). The interface is always the same (and therefore the methods), but the class can be anything, and i'd like to have it as a parameter to the function. Macros work fine, but I want to try to have it as a function. Razvan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
