Maybe we should qualify non-idiomatic code as being "idiotmatic", that may help reducing the # of posts referencing "idiomatic". However this only a letter way from making (slight) mistakes in the posts :)
I just spent my day's quota of idiotic writing ... Luc On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:22:27 -0600 Duane Searsmith <dsearsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps "idiot-magic" would sub? > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Sergey Didenko > <sergey.dide...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I coded mutable Dejkstra algorithm isolated in a single function, > > because it's easier for me to maintain it - I used to write a lot of > > mutable algorithms. But I consider this code not idiomatic though > > useful in my case. > > > > So I think idiomatic Clojure code is not as ubiquitous as you > > probably mean and the word "idiomatic" is quite useful for > > discussions. > > > >> In fact I challenge anyone to give an example of the least > >> idiomatic code written in Clojure (using Java interop is cheating). > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > > with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- Luc P. ================ The rabid Muppet -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
