On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 02:16, thenwithexpandedwingshesteershisflight <mathn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we please get bored of saying "idiomatic" and "in particular" > please ?
It's quite useful to be able to talk about the-way-of-expressing-this-concept-most-in-keeping-with-established-practice (idiomatic), particularly when a language still sees plenty of newcomers. The Python community, found a way around the problem you seem to be having by inventing their own word: pythonic. Do I hear any votes for "clojuresque"? Ok, I think I've spent my smart-a$$ quota for the day, Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
