On Oct 14, 11:23 pm, Devin Walters <dev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Responding to an earlier point in this thread: Now is the time for breaking > changes. ClojureScript is alpha. Use in production by enterprising folk > should not be discouraged, but at the sa(m|n)e time, I don't believe there > have been any mixed messages regarding whether or not cljs is > production-ready. Let's make something great and skip the "save backwards > compatibility!" discussion for later. [...]
As one who is using ClojureScript in production, I say, heartily, make the change. We all know where the backwards compatiblity road leads, and that's one reason why Clojure and ClojureScript exist. In reply to David's point, I have the opposite preference: I write in ClojureScript so that I can think in Clojure(Script) not Javascript. The impact on JS inter-op aesthetics looks slight to me. Cheers, Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
