I agree with you on making breaking changes sooner rather than later. This one seems fine to me; I execute no-arg functions on JavaScript objects more than I directly refer to them, so it'll be nice to not have to write (. obj (m)) anymore.
On Oct 14, 12:44 pm, Fogus <mefo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The tickethttp://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-89and the design > pagehttp://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://dev.clojure.org/display/desig... > describe the details of the change in ClojureScript. > > I would like to make this change (and the related Clojure changes) > sooner rather than later to avoid maximal pain. Breaking changes > stink, but I think that this particular change justifies the cost at > this stage. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks > :F -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
