> > Why all the attention to :use - I thought everyone agreed using it is > a bad idea? > Really? I thought it's use was only considered bad form in the absence of :only
> The only benefit I see is that you can avoid a (minimum 2 > character) prefix. > I would think the obvious benefit is its inclusion makes it easier port and share code between ClojureScript and Clojure. Every difference beyond the necessary (interop, no runtime compiler) makes re-use that much more difficult (see macro use, binding semantics, numerics, ns macro differences). Now if that's not a target and there is no expectation of sharing then all this is of course a non-issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
