On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak) 
<m...@kotka.de>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 5. August 2011 14:06:58 UTC+2 schrieb David Nolen:
>
>
> > Nope there's a not in the source to switch to refs and transactions.
>
> Woops. Indeed. I missed the comment.
>
>
> >> And a last question: Is this something like (or developed to or help
> >> to move) contrib.datalog?
> >
> > As far as I can tell core.logic can do almost everything
> > contrib.datalog does. The main missing piece is stratified negation.
>
> I think for my use case of core.logic might already be sufficient. I work
> with subcomponents which might be used various products. We get only these
> final products back. And it is tedious to get the chain down from the final
> product number to the subcomponent for various reasons which start with
> sloppy user input and do not end with SAP.
>
> I think core.logic would really help me here.
>
> As for the concurrency story: I would read in facts at the program start.
> But after that they'd remain static. So no issue here...
>
> Thanks for your awesome work on core.logic!
>
>
> Meikel
>

Please open up issues as you encounter them. The the defrel/fact/facts
features are of my own devising and haven't seen as much testing as the core
miniKanren bits. I'm sure there are a few bugs and some simple enhancements
that can make this use case more pleasant.

David

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to