On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > What kind of "strict control over state mutation" stories can we expect > when using core.logic ? > I mean, in the above example, I see no explicit use of refs, and I see > somewhat "unmanaged" state change with the introduction of the new category > name. This does not look like idiomatic clojure to me (from 10 000 feets, I > havent' studied core.logic yet) > > Cheers, > > -- > Laurent > I haven't thought out the concurrency implications. Mostly because I haven't heard enough feedback about this use case :) David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
