2011/7/18 Arthur Edelstein <arthuredelst...@gmail.com> > > Yep, this is great! How about syntax highlighting? > > Thanks, good suggestion! I'm not a huge fan of most syntax > highlighting -- what do you think would be helpful but unobtrusive? >
News: CCW's syntax highlighting mechanism has moved (in my local repo, already workable, but still some bugs to chase, and code to cleanup) from antlr to a full clojure stack. In a nutshell: coupled to the same mechanism that parses in real time the source code of the editor (using cgrand's parsley library under the covers), it uses a "view" mechanism on the parse tree to produce back a seq of tokens. It already offers features I had not cared to implement with the old antlr version, such as having metadata and #_(escaped code) treated as wholes (thanks to working with a parse tree and not just a tokens stream), etc. Where I would like to improve on ccw, is the current default choice of colors. Having you start syntax coloring for your IDE could be the right time for a consensus around this. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
