On Jul 12, 7:58 am, Colin Yates <colin.ya...@gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW, I like clojure.org the way it is. Without sounding like a complete > muppet, I think of Clojure as a set of surgeon's tools, all clean and layed > out on a shiny metal tray. Minimalist, simple, clean and massively > effective once you have thought about it are the attributes I associate with > Clojure and clojure.org fits that. On the other hand, I think of Scala as a > bunch of "handy man" tools in a bag, slightly less coherent, messy and a bit > more excitable and scala-lang.org re-enforces that.
You've never seen a surgery up close. Many of the tools are wrapped in plastic and you need a helper to find them, open them, hand them to you, and clean them. You've got so many layers on you can't feel anything. The patient is moaning with pain and draped in so much stuff you can hardly tell they are human. And for big jobs you use the same Black and Decker tools that home builders use. Adam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
