Hi, Am Dienstag, 12. Juli 2011 02:36:34 UTC+2 schrieb Ken Wesson:
> An argument could be made that Clojure is aimed more at those who do > that sort of "analytical comprehension" than those looking for the > latest jazzy fad, but an argument could also be made that attracting a > broader base is good and "jazzy fad" is a straw-man argument. :) > Maybe clojure is not directly aimed at those "analytical guys", but simply made by one. So Rich maybe just doesn't see a problem? Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
