On May 7, 2011, at 10:01 AM, isaac praveen wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, nrepl support for CCW, which Chas personnally did, has been an >> incredibly valuable addition. >> >> I'm glad to see more tools adopting it for backend support ! >> > > I agree.
Indeed, this was exactly my intention when I set out to build nREPL. So, we now have Eclipse/CCW, jark, and Enclojure (soon: http://groups.google.com/group/enclojure/msg/a742dd461c88109b) using nREPL; such common ground will certainly make it easier to support having diverse toolsets in teams of Clojure programmers, etc. On May 6, 2011, at 7:37 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant wrote: > We haven't started on a VimClojure nREPL fork yet. > > We should probably ask Meikel if he's already tackled it, there is a "nrepl" > tag on > bitbucket but it's about 6 months old. > https://bitbucket.org/kotarak/vimclojure/overview My recollection is that Meikel was a fair ways along in his nREPL implementation late last year. Hopefully he can chime in as to what the current status is of things there. > Also, the nrepl-server itself should be bundled with some basic > utilities. That is where jark is useful. > > Jark is a tool that provides > a) a nrepl-server > b) a set of extensible utilities to manage classpaths, namespaces, JVM both > on > c) a command-line client that communicates via the nREPL protocol, has > minimum runtime dependencies and can run on most platforms. > > It would be nice to have a jark/nREPL plus SLIME/Vim stack. nREPL + jark + some baseline set of introspection utilities and such (started to be described here: http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/IDE+tooling+backend) is looking like a proper foundation for Clojure tooling, regardless of platform/editor/etc. FWIW, I'd like to throw out the notion that perhaps some small part of jark might make sense to be rolled into the nREPL project itself (in particular, a command-line interface / client is needed -- there's one there, but it's far from ideal). Further, if the jark leads are open to it, it may be worth discussing over on clojure-dev to see what the appetite is among the core folks for a Clojure Contrib project with jark's objectives/scope. Cheers, - Chas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
