>> Also see related problems reported by others: >> http://osdir.com/ml/clojure/2010-10/msg00290.html (sorry, can't find >> it on the group.) > > Yes, resultset-seq does lowercase the column names and it doesn't > translate between - / _ either. But that's not part of c.j.j so, > whilst I may agree with the criticisms of it, I can't actually fix > that :) > > Perhaps someone from Clojure/core could speak to resultset-seq's behavior?
I don't want to make a breaking change to the existing API, but in a world there there is an actively-maintained clojure.java.jdbc I don't think a resultset function in core makes a lot of sense anyway. How about we mark core's resultset-seq as deprecated, with a link to the new project? Then c.j.j. can do a better resultset-seq, and we will leave the old fn in core for at least on major release cycle. Sound ok? Stu Stuart Halloway Clojure/core http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
