> 2011/4/19 Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com>: >>> Concerning my own modules in old contrib, there are three that I use myself >>> and that I am planning to maintain, independently of where they will end up: >>> - clojure.contrib.monads >>> - clojure.contrib.macro-utils >>> - clojure.contrib.generic >> >> There is an empty repos already waiting for your macro utils: >> https://github.com/clojure/tools.macro > > OK. Note that I don't like very much this name, tools.macro. Too > generic. tools.core could be better : would reflect functions that may > go into clojure.core, or that are to be considered at the same level > for contrib project as is clojure.core for clojure project. > Or something even more "specialized" in the name, if this makes sense, > like tools.composition, or tools.nilsafe for all nilsafe variants of > operators, etc.
tools.macro is a namespace for tools for macro writers. For things like -?> I proposed clojure.core.composition, which seems consistent with what you are saying (see http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Contrib+Library+Names). Stu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
