> Will this be any > better or worse: (defn m [f s] (fn [] (map f s))) then doing (foo) > instead of (eval foo)?
Armando - Generally I agree that the "m" function you defined is clearly preferred over a solution based on eval. However, this is a special case (too much to relate) where I needed a function to produce an s-expression. Thanks. -David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
