I wonder in which cases this code is a good choice: a function that returns uneval'ed code. Something about macros not being an option where a function is expected, or a kind of lazy eval? Will this be any better or worse: (defn m [f s] (fn [] (map f s))) then doing (foo) instead of (eval foo)?
On Apr 14, 6:46 am, David McNeil <mcneil.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am puzzled by the results below. Can anyone explain the difference > in behavior? > > -David > > ---- > > (defn mapper [f stream] > `(map ~f ~stream)) > > (eval (mapper #(+ 1 %) [10 11 12])) > ;; -> (11 12 13) > > (eval (mapper (partial + 1) [10 11 12])) > ;; -> No matching ctor found for class clojure.core$partial... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
