On Mar 15, 11:14 am, Paul Dorman <paul.dor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Saul, > > I'm happy to wait until Friday, but check your request queue before > you make the change yourself as I may submit one. I've made the change > on my own fork, but I've only changed the function definition from > private to public; I haven't looked into the changes required for > testing and documentation.
That's totally fine. I don't mind doing tests if you don't have time. Since you have a clearer idea on how to use the changes, I recommend that you do the documentation (even if its just rough notes). > > I'd probably prefer the approach I described partly to keep the > overhead of decryption on the LDAP server rather than on my > application server. Strictly speaking from ignorance, I'd guess that > the LDAP server would perform the decryption a little faster, and with > a smaller memory footprint. Also, binding to the LDAP server means > that your application only needs to know how to negotiate a secure > connection over LDAPS, irrespective of the encryption scheme used on > the directory server, removing the requirement to build in support for > every scheme likely to be encountered in the wild (which might also > introduce legal complications). I see the advantages now. Saul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
