Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> writes: Hi Laurent,
> Was playing with levenshtein (argh, where do I place the h -sorry > mister levenshtein-), and thougth it could be interesting to share my > current result here, to get some feedback. Looks really concise. Nice! > The following version works with any seq-able (not only Strings), but > hardwires function = for equality testing of seq values (rather good > default IMHO), but also hardwires the cost of 1 for either element > insertion, deletion, or swap. Isn't "swap" (aka replace) usually considered a deletion followed by an insertion, and thus with costs 2? Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
