Actually that would be fine as a solution as well. I'm stumped as to how to avoid repeating the same thing twice (once in function world and once in macro world).
ie. Let's assume that we have this destructuring function. How do we use that do program a destructuring let macro? -Patrick On Feb 7, 3:32 pm, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Am 07.02.2011 um 20:51 schrieb CuppoJava: > > >> Thanks for your answer Meikel. > > >> Your answer isn't that ugly. It's very similar to what I have as > >> well. > > >> I would like to know if you think it's possible to re-use "let" to do > >> this. I feel like I'm re-inventing the wheel somewhat. > > > I don't think you can use let without resorting to macros since let itself > > is one. Once in macro, always in macro world. > > > As fogus said: you could copy the logic from c.c/destructure and make it do > > the calls instead of emitting code. But I don't think there is a > > pre-fabricated function doing that. > > Arguably there should be, with the let macro calling it to do the > heavy lifting but also available for direct user use. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
