Hi, Am 07.02.2011 um 20:51 schrieb CuppoJava:
> Thanks for your answer Meikel. > > Your answer isn't that ugly. It's very similar to what I have as > well. > > I would like to know if you think it's possible to re-use "let" to do > this. I feel like I'm re-inventing the wheel somewhat. I don't think you can use let without resorting to macros since let itself is one. Once in macro, always in macro world. As fogus said: you could copy the logic from c.c/destructure and make it do the calls instead of emitting code. But I don't think there is a pre-fabricated function doing that. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
