Hi Eugen, 2011/2/6 Eugen Dück <eu...@dueck.org>: > scan -> email would be more convenient for me. > > @Chistopher >> people keep citing it as some unique requirement foisted upon the community >> by a power hungry dictator > > That's a generalization that lacks any relation to this thread, and I > guess even the clojure community in general. I'm not aware of any > criticism of our beloved dictator and I hope he'll serve many more > terms. As long as he doesn't torture his people (like force them into > signing CAs ;) > > Back to the git pull request question - nobody seems to know anything > about it, but that issue should not be related to legal issues, if > clojure maintainers pull only stuff from CA signers, right?
Maybe there's a problem with this "pull request", in that the act of bringing the code into the open source project is then done by the maintainer itself. The guarantees of pulling the exact changest the pull requester wanted to be incorporated are less clear than if the contributor explicitly sends the bits he wants to contribute. But maybe I'm wrong. Cheers, -- Laurent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
