Armando, thanks for a plausible explanation. Here is what happened after I made the suggested change:
user=> (prime-factors 600851475143) n: 600851475143 , f: 71 n: 8462696833 , f: 839 n: 10086647 , f: 1471 n: 6857 , f: 6857 #<CompilerException java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to clojure.lang.IFn (REPL:91)> I guess this something subtle with unordered vs. sorted-set as implicit factors accumulator. May be that is why the author of the solution had to use unordered set followed by (apply max ...). On Jan 13, 11:23 am, Armando Blancas <armando_blan...@yahoo.com> wrote: > A literal set is a unordered hash-set. To get the factors in order > change #{f} for (sorted-set f). > > On Jan 13, 7:09 am, Vitaly Peressada <vit...@ufairsoft.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The following solution by <b>mtgred</b> for <a href="http://clojure- > > euler.wikispaces.com/">Project Euler Clojure</a> problem 003 uses > > implicit recursion. > > > <pre> > > (use '[clojure.contrib.lazy-seqs :only (primes)]) > > (defn prime-factors [n] > > (let [f (some #(if (= 0 (rem n %)) %) primes)] > > (if (= f n) #{f} (conj (prime-factors (/ n f)) f)))) > > (apply max (prime-factors 600851475143)) > > </pre> > > > Here is above with added println > > > (defn prime-factors [n] > > (let [f (some #(if (= 0 (rem n %)) %) primes)] > > (println "n:" n ", f:" f) > > (if (= f n) > > #{f} > > (conj (prime-factors (/ n f)) f)))) > > > Which produces > > > n: 600851475143 , f: 71 > > n: 8462696833 , f: 839 > > n: 10086647 , f: 1471 > > n: 6857 , f: 6857 > > #{71 839 6857 1471} > > > Can anybody explain why 6857 comes 3rd? I would expect to be the last. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en