The following solution by <b>mtgred</b> for <a href="http://clojure- euler.wikispaces.com/">Project Euler Clojure</a> problem 003 uses implicit recursion.
<pre> (use '[clojure.contrib.lazy-seqs :only (primes)]) (defn prime-factors [n] (let [f (some #(if (= 0 (rem n %)) %) primes)] (if (= f n) #{f} (conj (prime-factors (/ n f)) f)))) (apply max (prime-factors 600851475143)) </pre> Here is above with added println (defn prime-factors [n] (let [f (some #(if (= 0 (rem n %)) %) primes)] (println "n:" n ", f:" f) (if (= f n) #{f} (conj (prime-factors (/ n f)) f)))) Which produces n: 600851475143 , f: 71 n: 8462696833 , f: 839 n: 10086647 , f: 1471 n: 6857 , f: 6857 #{71 839 6857 1471} Can anybody explain why 6857 comes 3rd? I would expect to be the last. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en