On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Jay Fields <j...@jayfields.com> wrote: > 2010/12/23 Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> >> >> It most certainly is not. > > Yes, it is.
Is not! >> Unlike cond clauses, methods might be >> scattered in different parts of a large code base > > _might_ be. But they don't need to be. It suffices for my argument that they might be. >> And of course my code added a couple of other nice features as well. > > That's not really relevant, is it? To whether it's "sucky"? Sure it is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
