Ken said: "That seems sucky. What about adding a priority parameter to your defmethod-analogue? The predicates are kept sorted by priority."
I disagree. To use your terms, I think your solution is equally "sucky". Sometimes adding config parameters makes sense and sometimes it adds noise. In this case, fns eval in the order defined seems perfectly reasonable to me. Like I said, they are equally "sucky", where sucky should be defined as: I like my way better. I prefer convention over configuration in general, but that's my opinion. Neither is universally better or "sucky" Sent from my iPhone On Dec 23, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: > That seems sucky. What about adding a priority parameter to your > defmethod-analogue? The predicates are kept sorted by priority. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
