I could, but I would have to add a watcher on every agent putting them into a seq hold by an atom. Which does not seem right, in some way...
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/12/17 nicolas.o...@gmail.com <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> Is there a way to wait for all agents to be up-to-date without using >> await ? >> >> I am in a specific case with a lot of agents and I want all of them to >> have finished their work, >> and only a few of them had initially work to do. >> It is quite wasteful to explicitly await for N agents when only p << N >> were working, and you know that the thread pool >> for agents is idle after the p have finished working. >> > > So you cannot just call await on the p agents ? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Sent from an IBM Model M, 15 August 1989. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
