On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know how common dynamic binding is in application code. It > tends to be in library code more often, which is a smaller number of > changes to make. Plus, the dynamic binding changes have a rationale > behind them that actually seems to me to make the tradeoff potentially > worth it. I find this situation quite humorous: 1.3 Dynamic binding breaking change Much faster. People don't seem to have strong opinions. But a lot of things break. People fix it and move on. 1.3 Primitive math Much faster. Everyone seems to have a strong opinion. Hardly anything breaks. People move on. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
