>> It takes almost zero time to offer opinions without bothering to check. > > That looks like yet another unproductive, non-constructive personal criticism.
Why do you think so? These people are just requesting you to check things for yourself instead engaging in this meaningless argument. The design decision of implementing "enhanced primitives" support in Clojure was taken months ago after a *lot* of intense debate, thinking & research. You are unwilling to dig the archives, read the implementation or even test an existing codebase for issues, yet you are accusing people of criticizing you just because they feel you should do a bit more research about this. Don't you think it's unfair of you? Talk is cheap, show us the code. Regards, BG -- Baishampayan Ghose b.ghose at gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
