On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Brian Goslinga <quickbasicg...@gmail.com>wrote:

>  (Since java.lang.BigInteger is
> slow on small numbers, clojure.lang.BigInt is also being introduced
> (which is the type of 1N) that should be as fast as math was in 1.2
> when the numbers fit into a long)
>

AFAIK, this hasn't been done yet, and clojure.lang.BigInt is just a stub
that is as slow as java.lang.BigInteger.  Is this correct?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to