Steve is trolling with that Lisp post.
There is so much noise in what he says,
there is no point beginning to reply.
And all of it would be off-topic.
Ignore it.
Tim Daly
On 12/14/2010 11:23 PM, Alex Osborne wrote:
javajosh<javaj...@gmail.com> writes:
Just ran across:
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html
Whoah! I had no idea there was so much, uh, 'intricacy' going on
behind Lisp. :)
Anyway, it was interesting to read it having a bit of Clojure under my
belt. With the exception of types, it seems like Clojure addresses
most, if not all, of the concerns he brings up.
What do you think?
There's a hint about it in one of his recent posts:
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2010/07/blogger-finger.html
"I used to have lot of open, long-standing concerns about the future of
programming and productivity, but my sabbatical last year finally
brought me some clojure."
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
