javajosh <javaj...@gmail.com> writes: > Just ran across: > > http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html > > Whoah! I had no idea there was so much, uh, 'intricacy' going on > behind Lisp. :) > > Anyway, it was interesting to read it having a bit of Clojure under my > belt. With the exception of types, it seems like Clojure addresses > most, if not all, of the concerns he brings up. > > What do you think?
There's a hint about it in one of his recent posts: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2010/07/blogger-finger.html "I used to have lot of open, long-standing concerns about the future of programming and productivity, but my sabbatical last year finally brought me some clojure." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
