I'd be highly dubious of this even if it was free, performance-wise. > and < are not clearly defined on strings and in general this kind of thing seems like an inroad for the kind of baffling implicit conversion-type behaviours you can see in PHP or JavaScript. Functions that do something like those in the OP might be useful, but they should be named something that doesn't carry so much intuitive baggage already.
-- Ryan Sattler -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
