2010/11/16 Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de>
> Salut Laurent,
>
> On 16 Nov., 09:51, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Agreed with the explanation, but ... 12% of what, exactly ?
>
> 6,502692ms / 7,393586ms ~ 0,88 => 12% improvement, no?
>
> But maybe this whole microbenchmarking story is paper waste. As I
> said: quick'n'dirty.
>
I don't know.
But my thougts were just that if you want to measure the time for a
particular way "W" of coding things (and a variant "Wv"), and you test this
with other computations "OC",
then
(not=
(/ (time Wv)
(time W))
(/ (+ (time Wv) (time OC))
(+ (time W) (time OC))))
?
Especially if (time OC) is non neglictible ... ?
> Will now drop out of perfomance discussions...
>
> Meikel
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
