Salut Laurent, On 16 Nov., 09:51, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed with the explanation, but ... 12% of what, exactly ? 6,502692ms / 7,393586ms ~ 0,88 => 12% improvement, no? But maybe this whole microbenchmarking story is paper waste. As I said: quick'n'dirty. Will now drop out of perfomance discussions... Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
