On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:23 AM, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you know of a reason why (deftype [foo & more]) isn't read in as > having two fields where the second is a seq? > deftype is low level and exposes limitations of the host and constructors should not be exposed directly (add a new field, change the field ordering and you'll have to fix all the constructor calls) but through a factory fn. Barring that, would it be reasonable to disallow & as a valid field > name, thus preventing this class of error? > It sounds reasonable. Christophe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
