On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> c has the value "Unbound". The semantic has not changed, the way to > carry the semantic has. > > Now if you try to really "use" c, for example use it in call position, > then since Unbound implements IFn, you'll have the appropriate > exception because it correctly overrides IFn's invoke(...) methods. It begs a question then, why would I do that? Where would that be of use? devmac:~ jacek$ clj -13 CLOJURE_DIR: /Users/jacek/apps/clojure CLOJURE_CONTRIB_JAR: /Users/jacek/apps/clojure-contrib-1.3.0-alpha2.jar Clojure 1.3.0-alpha2 user=> (def c) #'user/c user=> (c) IllegalStateException Attempting to call unbound fn: #'user/c clojure.lang.Var$Unbound.throwArity (Var.java:43) user=> (type c) clojure.lang.Var$Unbound Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://jaceklaskowski.pl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
