On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com>wrote:

> 2010/10/30 Tim Daly <d...@axiom-developer.org>:
> >  Macros in lisp get used for three general purposes, at least
> > in my experience.
> >
> > The first purpose is efficiency. In common lisp you will find
> > that you can generate very machine-efficient (aka optimized
> > fortran level) binary instruction sequences if you add type
> > information. This gets tedious to do in code so you write a
> > macro. So (+ x y) has to assume that x and y are anything,
> > including non-numeric. If you write a (plus x y) macro it
> > can expand to
> > (the fixnum (+ (the fixnum x) (the fixnum y)))
> > which I have seen optimized into a single machine instruction.
> > Macros could be used to solve the boxing/unboxing issues in
> > Clojure.
>
> For writing DSLs, consider the excellent speak of cgrand at the conj :
> (not= DSL macros)
>
> Here are the slides: http://speakerrate.com/talks/4895-not-dsl-macros


Here's something odd: I can't view the slides. I have Chrome and Firefox
here. If I go there in Chrome the grey box that I assume should contain the
slides is blank. I'm guessing they used Flash instead of Java or AJAX; and I
haven't been able to get Flash working in Chrome.

On the other hand if I go there in Firefox I get told "The connection was
reset". This happens also if I prepend "www." to the domain name. So
apparently speakerrate.com slams the door on Firefox users -- I thought that
kind of browser-discrimination stupidity went out with the 90s? -- and
indeed violates RFCs by having www.speakerrate.com respond with RST to a
connection on port 80.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to