Binding uses dynamic scope, not lexical scope, right? So any functions called before the binding expires will be affected by the new bindings, not just the code explicitly within its lexical scope.
On Sep 15, 11:35 am, Luke VanderHart <luke.vanderh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unless I misunderstand something, (binding...) wouldn't work for this > because I'd have to wrap all of the code I wanted to be "modified" > within a (binding...) form. Fine if it's one source file, not so fine > if I have dozens... Or am I missing something? > > On Sep 15, 2:26 pm, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Your example can be solved with (binding ...) > > > For the proposal, I think it's a bad idea : huge potential for abuse > > (and importing abuse from other namespaces written by other people) > > and little benefit. > > > I wouldn't be so strongly against it if it was in a delimited scope. > > > In any case, you can probably implement it as a library on top of the > > compiler, with a code walker. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
