Unless I misunderstand something, (binding...) wouldn't work for this because I'd have to wrap all of the code I wanted to be "modified" within a (binding...) form. Fine if it's one source file, not so fine if I have dozens... Or am I missing something?
On Sep 15, 2:26 pm, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > Your example can be solved with (binding ...) > > For the proposal, I think it's a bad idea : huge potential for abuse > (and importing abuse from other namespaces written by other people) > and little benefit. > > I wouldn't be so strongly against it if it was in a delimited scope. > > In any case, you can probably implement it as a library on top of the > compiler, with a code walker. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
