It is public idea in Ruby community that Sinatra is best used for
rapid prototyping and creating API for web application.
Maybe because it isn't MVC framework, I don't know.
Any way I though since Compojure is similar to Sinatra it will be used
for the same purposes.

On Sep 5, 5:21 pm, James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com> wrote:
> On 4 September 2010 16:44, HB <hubaghd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If Compojure is micro web framework like Sinatra, does this means it
> > is not suitable for large web applications?
>
> The "micro" refers to how much the framework does for you, rather than
> the size of the application.
>
> The advantage of a framework like Ruby on Rails, is that it provides
> you with a well-written basis from which to build your application.
> This can make it easier to get started.
>
> The disadvantage is that it ties you into a specific structure, which
> can be a hindrance if you happen to need something the framework
> doesn't provide. Micro-frameworks provide more freedom, at the cost of
> having to do more setup work at the beginning.
>
> It's not unusual for large sites to be run on minimal web frameworks.
> For instance, up until recently, Reddit ran on web.py.
>
> - James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to