Thanks for focusing solely on one example, and still not providing any
useful, specific information.

There may be a number of possible implementations for a given design
criterion. The binary-tree "memory allocation/deallocation" test (for
example) includes not only that, but also math ops, in a particular
fashion, a particular style of looping, with particular string
concatenation, and particular places for printing to stdout, etc.
>From what I can infer, the criterion being tested is how well can
clojure code perform when it's written just like the imperative
version in, say, C++.  I had been assuming this was a serious
comparison various languages performance in achieving a particular
design goal.

Time to move on to something productive.


On Aug 24, 11:17 am, Isaac Gouy <igo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 24, 9:50 am, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It would have been more useful to answer the question (particularly
> > with regards to a canonical implementation) than getting all passive-
> > aggressive.
>
> Did you find any programs that didn't perform itemCheck?
>
> In Clojure does one integer addition and one integer subtraction per
> node take a significant amount of time?
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 24, 5:55 am, Isaac Gouy <igo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 23, 7:07 pm, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > It's never been clear to me exactly what the code is supposed to be
> > > > do. For example, the "spec" for the binary-tree test is so wholly
> > > > lacking in any details that I'm left to infer that one is supposed to
> > > > copy an implementation used previously, though without any indication
> > > > as to which is the canonical version. Do I really need to perform the
> > > > itemCheck math ops in the binary-tree test which is ostensibly about
> > > > allocating/deallocating memory?  Who knows?
>
> > > Some people complain - underspecified - and some people complain -
> > > overspecified - and some people just contribute programs.
>
> > > Some people complain - forced to write code that isn't idiomatic - as
> > > if there was a canonical version. (Did you find any programs that
> > > didn't perform itemCheck?)
>
> > > In Clojure does one integer addition and one integer subtraction per
> > > node take a significant amount of time? Who knows? (I guess you could
> > > measure with/without.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to