On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Randy Hudson <randy_hud...@mac.com> wrote: > Well, #(<= lo % hi) is to my mind much more readable than (fn [x] (<= > lo x hi)), especially embedded in another form or two (as it would > be). >
that may be true. though this IMO is partly due to the (<=) construct's argument order. This is the case where it is a single argument function yet you need to explicitly spell that out as it is in the middle. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
