On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Joop Kiefte <iko...@gmail.com> wrote: > bad example =/ > > Yes, it is > > but you get the gist I hope > > better example: #(first (sort %)) ;) > Yes, though I think it is still cleaner if it is expressed as:
(map (comp first sort) [[3 2] [4 5]]) In other words, if it is a single argument(i.e. %), it is usually redundant as f.g(i.e. (comp f g)) seems to be clearer about the intention(what I want, not how I want), more than one argument, I would say destructure them looks better. I know it is a matter of style but just that if there is a restriction on nested form, it further limit the cases where it can be used and if that is the case, why use up the cache in our brain to remember one more form? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
