Hi, On 20 Aug., 07:18, ngocdaothanh <ngocdaoth...@gmail.com> wrote: > > (defn foo > > "..." > > ([a] ...) > > ([a b] ...)) > > Is there any way to add docstring for each case? (One for summary, one > for [a], and one for [a b].)
No. (And honestly: I don't see any use for this. Why is one docstring not enough to describe the behaviour of the function?) Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
