On Aug 18, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Greg wrote: > On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Michael Gardner wrote: > >> On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Greg wrote: >> >>> http://gregslepak.posterous.com/on-lisps-readability >> >> That article is dishonest. > > Speaking as the author, I'm a bit offended.
Too bad. If you wanted to focus on the trailing-parens (which you clearly did in that article), you should have kept everything else the same between your examples. If you wanted to comment on indentation as well, you should have (a) given it equal prominence in your discussion, (b) used separate code examples for trailing-parens vs indentation, and/or (c) made a separate post. Closing the comments after people started to question you on this wasn't a good move, either (otherwise I'd be commenting there rather than here). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
