Hi, On 13 Aug., 14:58, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's very interesting. From a performance point of view, is there a > penalty involved in being in a case > where the implementation does not use interfaces? Using extend is slower, but more dynamic (read: mix-in via map merge vs. hard-wiring things with inline definition). Hmm... Is it possible to provide some methods inline in a defrecord, and some methods via extend? Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
